Difference between revisions of "LZMA2 compression"
(Created page with 'LZMA compression is done with the xz-utils library. A problem with LZMA is, that with higher compression rates the memory needed for decompression increases. Using the highest r…')
Revision as of 16:02, 17 October 2010
LZMA compression is done with the xz-utils library.
A problem with LZMA is, that with higher compression rates the memory needed for decompression increases. Using the highest rate 9, 65 MB RAM is needed. On the Nanonote, which we want to support we have only 32 MB installed. Tests showed, that level 4 is too much, but 3 is ok. xz-utils has a additional extreme-flag, which justifies the lzma parameters so that the compression ratio of lzma level 3 is almost identical with bzip2. The big advantage is, that decompression of lzma is much faster (factor 3-4) than bzip2. The downside is, that creating zim files with lzma is much slower than bzip2 and the support for xz-utils is not yet that widespread.
Here are some test results:
Creating a file with 55498 index entries with 28936 articles.
size: 90207329 creating: 0:02:18 reading random access: 29 #/s creating full text index: 00:03:01 size of full text index: 92184996 reading random access on Nanonote: 0.7 #/s
size: 90286916 creating: 0:12:01 reading random access: 120 #/s creating full text index: 00:03:03 size of full text index: 87282408 reading random access on Nanonote: 2.3 #/s
The tests (except the benchmark on the Nanonote) are done on our test machine - a dual core AMD 2,6GHz.